The best and most comprehensive Porn Site Reviews on the net -
Reviews, design, images are licensed or © XXXPwnage.com, all rights reserved
|
Rating |
Score |
Overall |
|
5 Stars |
9 or above |
Excellent |
|
4 Stars |
8 to 8.9 |
Very Good |
|
3 Stars |
7 to 7.9 |
Good |
|
2 Stars |
6 to 6.9 |
Average |
|
1 Star |
5 or below |
Poor |
366-
|
TheyareGirls.com |
Rating (Max 10) |
|
Site Layout |
9 |
|
Navigation |
9 |
|
Image Quality |
10 |
|
Video Quality |
10 |
|
Content Quantity |
8 |
|
Exclusive Content |
10 |
|
Updated Content |
7 |
|
Download Times |
10 |
|
FAQ/Help/Support |
10 |
|
Cost versus Content |
8 |
|
Overall Score |
9.1 |


TheyAreGirls.com
Reviewed 14 August 2009
The semi-
Visually, all okay. Nothing groundbreaking or dynamic, but neatly composed with relevant
menu and thumbnail style navigation in grids. As is commonplace, recent updates appear
first and top rated photos linger down the right hand side. Click the pics to convey
the goods -
Anyway, content is not uniformly split between photo galleries and video -
Gallery presentation is what I’d call a standard layout, 4x4 per page running to
a maximum of 6 pages (work it out… 16 images per page times 6 pages equals 96 pics
in total -
In addition to this amazing image archive, I had heard -
Okay, what’s the content action all about? Well, mainly solo girl posing from fully
clothed to nude (classic stripping to be honest) in various settings/locations, outdoors
and in. Dildo usage is not predominant but there all the same, as are a couple of
girl/girl sets/scenes which are tame enough to be bracketed softcore -
Has this site made the grade? Well, in a lot of respects yes. This girl fest of a
site provides top notch imagery and the very finest HD movies so it scores highly
there. Everything else works fine enough. Content quantity is not extensive but it
is exclusive and the models are pretty, some obviously new to modelling -
Higher than average membership ($29.95 for 30 days) may make you shudder, but it
comes with a sweetener -
Samples